ARR467 schrieb am 10.05.2024 04:47:
DrM schrieb am 09.05.2024 20:48:
jzzargo schrieb am 09.05.2024 20:40:
Ah, da ist jemand ganz scharf auf ein bißchen Atomkrieg?
Ja, Putin z.B.
Russland bestellt Botschafter ein und kündigt Manöver mit Atomwaffen an
Ja, wenn es soweit kommt, dann wirst du es sehen. Es entspricht der russischen Nukleardoktrin, in dem von mir beschriebenen Fall Nuklearwaffen einzusetzen. Da muss man kein Recht beugen.
Doch, natürlich. Die Krim gehört nicht zu Russland, auch wenn Russland das behauptet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_68/262
Was die UN sagt oder was da gesagt wurde ist scheißegal!
Wenn der Antrag der Krim entschieden wird, die Anweisung des Ukrainers Chruschtschow, dass die Krim Russland weggenommen und der Ukraine gegeben wird, annulliert/gelöscht wird (weil illegal/rechstwiedrig), dann hat es nie eine ukrainische Krim gegeben und die historische Gerechtigkeit ist endgültig wiederhergestellt!
https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/why-did-russia-give-away-crimea-sixty-years-ago
"The earlier published documents, and materials that have emerged more recently, make clear that the transfer of Crimea from the RSFSR to the UkrSSR was carried out in accordance with the 1936 Soviet constitution, which in Article 18 stipulated that “the territory of a Union Republic may not be altered without its consent.” The proceedings of the USSR Supreme Soviet Presidium meeting indicate that both the RSFSR and the UkrSSR had given their consent via their republic parliaments. One of the officials present at the 19 February session, Otto Kuusinen, even boasted that “only in our country (the USSR) is it possible that issues of the utmost importance such as the territorial transfer of individual oblasts to a particular republic can be decided without any difficulties.” One might argue that the process in 1954 would have been a lot better if it had been complicated and difficult, but no matter how one judges the expeditiousness of the territorial reconfiguration, the main point to stress here is that it is incorrect to say (as some Russian commentators and government officials recently have) that Crimea was transferred unconstitutionally or illegally. The legal system in the Soviet Union was mostly a fiction, but the transfer did occur in accordance with the rules in effect at the time. Moreover, regardless of how the transfer was carried out, the Russian Federation expressly accepted Ukraine’s 1991 borders both in the December 1991 Belovezhskaya Pushcha accords (the agreements that precipitated and codified the dissolution of the Soviet Union) and in the December 1994 Budapest Memorandum that finalized Ukraine’s status as a non-nuclear weapons state."