Fätty schrieb am 18.08.2021 14:52:
ich lese hier dauern "Menschheitsverbrechen" und "Kindesmisshandlung" oder "Massenmord" und so weiter, alles Begriffe der Empörung.
Um sich dann aufs Sofa fallen zu lassen und Fußball zu gucken? Na, ist ja alles nicht so schlimm.
Solange die Grundbedürfnisse (Fressen, Ficken und Schlafen) gedeckt sind sowie ein geringes Mass an Sicherheit vorhanden ist, wird wohl zu keiner Revolution kommen.
Hier noch eine interessante Studie unter welchen Umständen Revolutionen keimen konnten:
When revolutions happen: usual understanding. People usually believe
that revolutions happen when the situation worsens to such extent that life
under the old regime becomes practically intolerable. Paraphrasing the famous
saying attributed to Marie-Antoinette, people start a revolution when they do
not even have enough bread to eat.When revolutions actually happen. However, a historical analysis shows
that the usual understanding is wrong; see, e.g., [1, 2, 3]. Most revolutions
happen not when the situation is at its worst, they usually happen when the
situation has been improving for some time and then suddenly gets worse –
although, by the way, never as bad as it was before the improvement started.How can we explain this? This is an interesting observation, but it leaves
one puzzled: why? There are well-designed theories of human decision making,and experiments show that in most situations, people act rationally: the more
their needs are satisfied, in general, the happier they are.
So how come that right before the revolution, when the level of living is
higher (often much higher) than in the recent past, people are so much less happy
that they start a revolution – while in the past, when their living conditions were
much worse, they were sufficiently satisfied – at least so as to remain obedient.
How can we explain this unexpected (and somewhat counterintuitive) behavior?
https://scholarworks.utep.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2292&context=cs_techrep