Zu den Medien Manipulationen von damals, was den Deutschen
Steuerzahler über 10 Milliarden Dollar kostete, damit Kohl und Co. so
gerne auch die Rüstungs Profite mit Schreiber, Möllemann und Co. mit
den Saudis machen wollte.
Geschäft ist halt Geschäft bei Mafia Politikern (Kohl, Genscher,
Schäuble, Kinkel, Mölleman), denn ohne den Irak Krieg hätte die
CDU-FDP diese Millionen aus den Fuchs Panzern etc. nicht einstreichen
können.
--------------------------------
wir hatten hier schon mal auch einen Video link eines Teiles des
Gespäches und dieses Video wurde damals auch im ORF gezeigt.
Die USA wollten damals bessere BEziehungen zu Saddam und ebenso
niedrigere Öl Preise.
Glapsie: Wir werden Kuweit nicht verteidigen etc..!!
At a Washington press conference called the next day, July 26, 1990,
State Department spokesperson Margaret Tutweiler was asked by
journalists:
"Has the United States sent any type of diplomatic message to the
Iraqis about putting 30,000 troops on the border with Kuwait? Has
there been any type of protest communicated from the United States
government?"
to which she responded:
"I'm entirely unaware of any such protest."
"United States has no commitment to defend Kuwait and the U.S.
has no intention of defending Kuwait if it is attacked by Iraq."
---------------------------------------------------
aus
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/NYT312A.html
Mr. President, not only do I want to say that President Bush wanted
better and deeper relations with Iraq, but he also wants an Iraqi
contribution to peace and prosperity in the Middle East. President
Bush is an intelligent man. He is not going to declare an economic
war against Iraq.
You are right. It is true what you say that we do not want higher
prices for oil. But I would ask you to examine the possibility of not
charging too high a price for oil.
HUSSEIN: We do not want too high prices for oil. And I remind you
that in 1974 I gave Tariq Aziz the idea for an article he wrote which
criticized the policy of keeping oil prices high. It was the first
Arab article which expressed this view.
Shifting Price of Oil
TARIQ AZIZ: Our policy in OPEC opposes sudden jumps in oil prices.
HUSSEIN: Twenty-five dollars a barrel is not a high price.
GLASPIE: We have many Americans who would like to see the price go
above $25 because they come from oil-producing states.
HUSSEIN: The price at one stage had dropped to $12 a barrel and a
reduction in the modest Iraqi budget of $6 billion to $7 billion is a
disaster.
GLASPIE: I think I understand this. I have lived here for years. I
admire your extraordinary efforts to rebuild your country. I know you
need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should
have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion
on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with
Kuwait.
I was in the American Embassy in Kuwait during the late 60's. The
instruction we had during this period was that we should express no
opinion on this issue and that the issue is not associated with
America. James Baker has directed our official spokesmen to emphasize
this instruction. .........I now speak of oil...........I simply
describe the concern of my Government. And I do not mean that the
situation is a simple situation. But our concern is a simple one.
HUSSEIN: We do not ask people not to be concerned when peace is at
issue. This is a noble human feeling which we all feel. It is natural
for you as a superpower to be concerned. But what we ask is not to
express your concern in a way that would make an aggressor believe
that he is getting support for his aggression.
.........
Talks With Mubarak
GLASPIE: I spent four beautiful years in Egypt.
HUSSEIN: The Egyptian people are kind and good and ancient. The oil
people are supposed to help the Egyptian people, but they are mean
beyond belief. It is painful to admit it, but some of them are
disliked by Arabs because of their greed.
GLASPIE: Mr. President, it would be helpful if you could give us an
assessment of the effort made by your Arab brothers and whether they
have achieved anything.
HUSSEIN:. On this subject, we agreed with President Mubarak that the
Prime Minister of Kuwait would meet with the deputy chairman of the
Revolution Command Council in Saudi Arabia, because the Saudis
initiated contact with us, aided by President Mubarak's efforts. He
just telephoned me a short while ago to say the Kuwaitis have agreed
to that suggestion.
GLASPIE: Congratulations.
HUSSEIN: A protocol meeting will be held in Saudi Arabia. Then the
meeting will be transferred to Baghdad for deeper discussion directly
between Kuwait and Iraq. We hope we will reach some result. We hope
that the long-term view and the real interests will overcome Kuwaiti
greed.
GLASPIE: May I ask you when you expect Sheik Saad to come to Baghdad?
HUSSEIN: I suppose it would be on Saturday or Monday at the latest. I
told brother Mubarak that the agreement should be in Baghdad Saturday
or Sunday. You know that brother Mubarak's visits have always been a
good omen.
GLASPIE: This is good news. Congratulations.
.....
GLASPIE: I am planning to go to the United States next Monday. I hope
I will meet with President Bush in Washington next week. I thought to
postpone my trip because of the difficulties we are facing. But now I
will fly on Monday.
[Another transcript, which includes a section which was not published
in the NYT, contains the following exchange]
HUSSEIN: If we could keep the whole of the Shatt al Arab - our
strategic goal in our war with Iran - we will make concessions (to
the Kuwaitis). But, if we are forced to choose between keeping half
of the Shatt and the whole of Iraq (i.e., in Saddam’s view, including
Kuwait) then we will give up all of the Shatt to defend our claims on
Kuwait to keep the whole of Iraq in the shape we wish it to be.
(pause). What is the United States’ opinion on this?
GLASPIE We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts, such as
your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary (of State James) Baker has
directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the
1960’s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America. (Saddam
smiles)’
This transcript is available at
http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/institutional_analysis/saddam.html
At a Washington press conference called the next day, July 26, 1990,
State Department spokesperson Margaret Tutweiler was asked by
journalists:
"Has the United States sent any type of diplomatic message to the
Iraqis about putting 30,000 troops on the border with Kuwait? Has
there been any type of protest communicated from the United States
government?"
to which she responded:
"I'm entirely unaware of any such protest."
On July 31st, two days before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, John
Kelly, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern affairs,
testified to Congress that the
"United States has no commitment to defend Kuwait and the U.S.
has no intention of defending Kuwait if it is attacked by Iraq."
Eight days later, on August 2, 1990, Saddam Hussein's massed troops
invaded and occupied Kuwait (ironically, this was done in a method
historically similar to the American annexation of Texas).
One month later in Baghdad, British journalists obtained the tape and
transcript of the Hussein-Glaspie meeting on July 25, 1990. In order
to verify this astounding information, they attempted to confront Ms.
Glaspie as she was leaving the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.
Journalist 1:
"Are the transcripts (holding them up) correct, Madam Ambassador?"
(Ambassador Glaspie does not respond)
Journalist 2:
"You knew Saddam was going to invade (Kuwait), but you didn't warn
him not to. You didn't tell him America would defend Kuwait. You told
him the oppose - that America was not associated with Kuwait."
Journalist 1:
"You encouraged this aggression - his invasion. What were you
thinking?"
U.S. Ambassador Glaspie:
"Obviously, I didn't think, and nobody else did, that the Iraqis were
going to take ALL of Kuwait."
Journalist 1:
"You thought he was just going to take SOME of it? But how COULD
YOU?! Saddam told you that, if negotiations failed, he would give up
his Iran (Shatt al Arab Waterway) goal for the "WHOLE of Iraq, in the
shape we wish it to be." You KNOW that includes Kuwait, which the
Iraqis have always viewed as an historic part of their country!"
(Ambassador Glaspie says nothing, pushing past the two journalists to
leave)
"America green-lighted the invasion. At a minimum, you admit
signalling Saddam that some aggression was okay - that the U.S. would
not oppose a grab of the al-Rumalya oil field, the disputed border
strip and the Gulf Islands (including Bubiyan) - territories claimed
by Iraq?"
(Again, Ambassador Glaspie says nothing as a limousine door closes
behind her and the car drives off.)
Steuerzahler über 10 Milliarden Dollar kostete, damit Kohl und Co. so
gerne auch die Rüstungs Profite mit Schreiber, Möllemann und Co. mit
den Saudis machen wollte.
Geschäft ist halt Geschäft bei Mafia Politikern (Kohl, Genscher,
Schäuble, Kinkel, Mölleman), denn ohne den Irak Krieg hätte die
CDU-FDP diese Millionen aus den Fuchs Panzern etc. nicht einstreichen
können.
--------------------------------
wir hatten hier schon mal auch einen Video link eines Teiles des
Gespäches und dieses Video wurde damals auch im ORF gezeigt.
Die USA wollten damals bessere BEziehungen zu Saddam und ebenso
niedrigere Öl Preise.
Glapsie: Wir werden Kuweit nicht verteidigen etc..!!
At a Washington press conference called the next day, July 26, 1990,
State Department spokesperson Margaret Tutweiler was asked by
journalists:
"Has the United States sent any type of diplomatic message to the
Iraqis about putting 30,000 troops on the border with Kuwait? Has
there been any type of protest communicated from the United States
government?"
to which she responded:
"I'm entirely unaware of any such protest."
"United States has no commitment to defend Kuwait and the U.S.
has no intention of defending Kuwait if it is attacked by Iraq."
---------------------------------------------------
aus
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/NYT312A.html
Mr. President, not only do I want to say that President Bush wanted
better and deeper relations with Iraq, but he also wants an Iraqi
contribution to peace and prosperity in the Middle East. President
Bush is an intelligent man. He is not going to declare an economic
war against Iraq.
You are right. It is true what you say that we do not want higher
prices for oil. But I would ask you to examine the possibility of not
charging too high a price for oil.
HUSSEIN: We do not want too high prices for oil. And I remind you
that in 1974 I gave Tariq Aziz the idea for an article he wrote which
criticized the policy of keeping oil prices high. It was the first
Arab article which expressed this view.
Shifting Price of Oil
TARIQ AZIZ: Our policy in OPEC opposes sudden jumps in oil prices.
HUSSEIN: Twenty-five dollars a barrel is not a high price.
GLASPIE: We have many Americans who would like to see the price go
above $25 because they come from oil-producing states.
HUSSEIN: The price at one stage had dropped to $12 a barrel and a
reduction in the modest Iraqi budget of $6 billion to $7 billion is a
disaster.
GLASPIE: I think I understand this. I have lived here for years. I
admire your extraordinary efforts to rebuild your country. I know you
need funds. We understand that and our opinion is that you should
have the opportunity to rebuild your country. But we have no opinion
on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with
Kuwait.
I was in the American Embassy in Kuwait during the late 60's. The
instruction we had during this period was that we should express no
opinion on this issue and that the issue is not associated with
America. James Baker has directed our official spokesmen to emphasize
this instruction. .........I now speak of oil...........I simply
describe the concern of my Government. And I do not mean that the
situation is a simple situation. But our concern is a simple one.
HUSSEIN: We do not ask people not to be concerned when peace is at
issue. This is a noble human feeling which we all feel. It is natural
for you as a superpower to be concerned. But what we ask is not to
express your concern in a way that would make an aggressor believe
that he is getting support for his aggression.
.........
Talks With Mubarak
GLASPIE: I spent four beautiful years in Egypt.
HUSSEIN: The Egyptian people are kind and good and ancient. The oil
people are supposed to help the Egyptian people, but they are mean
beyond belief. It is painful to admit it, but some of them are
disliked by Arabs because of their greed.
GLASPIE: Mr. President, it would be helpful if you could give us an
assessment of the effort made by your Arab brothers and whether they
have achieved anything.
HUSSEIN:. On this subject, we agreed with President Mubarak that the
Prime Minister of Kuwait would meet with the deputy chairman of the
Revolution Command Council in Saudi Arabia, because the Saudis
initiated contact with us, aided by President Mubarak's efforts. He
just telephoned me a short while ago to say the Kuwaitis have agreed
to that suggestion.
GLASPIE: Congratulations.
HUSSEIN: A protocol meeting will be held in Saudi Arabia. Then the
meeting will be transferred to Baghdad for deeper discussion directly
between Kuwait and Iraq. We hope we will reach some result. We hope
that the long-term view and the real interests will overcome Kuwaiti
greed.
GLASPIE: May I ask you when you expect Sheik Saad to come to Baghdad?
HUSSEIN: I suppose it would be on Saturday or Monday at the latest. I
told brother Mubarak that the agreement should be in Baghdad Saturday
or Sunday. You know that brother Mubarak's visits have always been a
good omen.
GLASPIE: This is good news. Congratulations.
.....
GLASPIE: I am planning to go to the United States next Monday. I hope
I will meet with President Bush in Washington next week. I thought to
postpone my trip because of the difficulties we are facing. But now I
will fly on Monday.
[Another transcript, which includes a section which was not published
in the NYT, contains the following exchange]
HUSSEIN: If we could keep the whole of the Shatt al Arab - our
strategic goal in our war with Iran - we will make concessions (to
the Kuwaitis). But, if we are forced to choose between keeping half
of the Shatt and the whole of Iraq (i.e., in Saddam’s view, including
Kuwait) then we will give up all of the Shatt to defend our claims on
Kuwait to keep the whole of Iraq in the shape we wish it to be.
(pause). What is the United States’ opinion on this?
GLASPIE We have no opinion on your Arab - Arab conflicts, such as
your dispute with Kuwait. Secretary (of State James) Baker has
directed me to emphasize the instruction, first given to Iraq in the
1960’s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with America. (Saddam
smiles)’
This transcript is available at
http://www.totse.com/en/conspiracy/institutional_analysis/saddam.html
At a Washington press conference called the next day, July 26, 1990,
State Department spokesperson Margaret Tutweiler was asked by
journalists:
"Has the United States sent any type of diplomatic message to the
Iraqis about putting 30,000 troops on the border with Kuwait? Has
there been any type of protest communicated from the United States
government?"
to which she responded:
"I'm entirely unaware of any such protest."
On July 31st, two days before the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, John
Kelly, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern affairs,
testified to Congress that the
"United States has no commitment to defend Kuwait and the U.S.
has no intention of defending Kuwait if it is attacked by Iraq."
Eight days later, on August 2, 1990, Saddam Hussein's massed troops
invaded and occupied Kuwait (ironically, this was done in a method
historically similar to the American annexation of Texas).
One month later in Baghdad, British journalists obtained the tape and
transcript of the Hussein-Glaspie meeting on July 25, 1990. In order
to verify this astounding information, they attempted to confront Ms.
Glaspie as she was leaving the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.
Journalist 1:
"Are the transcripts (holding them up) correct, Madam Ambassador?"
(Ambassador Glaspie does not respond)
Journalist 2:
"You knew Saddam was going to invade (Kuwait), but you didn't warn
him not to. You didn't tell him America would defend Kuwait. You told
him the oppose - that America was not associated with Kuwait."
Journalist 1:
"You encouraged this aggression - his invasion. What were you
thinking?"
U.S. Ambassador Glaspie:
"Obviously, I didn't think, and nobody else did, that the Iraqis were
going to take ALL of Kuwait."
Journalist 1:
"You thought he was just going to take SOME of it? But how COULD
YOU?! Saddam told you that, if negotiations failed, he would give up
his Iran (Shatt al Arab Waterway) goal for the "WHOLE of Iraq, in the
shape we wish it to be." You KNOW that includes Kuwait, which the
Iraqis have always viewed as an historic part of their country!"
(Ambassador Glaspie says nothing, pushing past the two journalists to
leave)
"America green-lighted the invasion. At a minimum, you admit
signalling Saddam that some aggression was okay - that the U.S. would
not oppose a grab of the al-Rumalya oil field, the disputed border
strip and the Gulf Islands (including Bubiyan) - territories claimed
by Iraq?"
(Again, Ambassador Glaspie says nothing as a limousine door closes
behind her and the car drives off.)