KGB schrieb am 10. September 2006 18:40
> Pisaopfer schrieb am 10. September 2006 18:33
> > http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
>
> zitat aus dieses links:
>
> Based on the sizes of the person standing next to the debris and
> other objects in the photographs that we can use for comparison, we
> estimate that the disk is approximately 25 to 30 inches (63.5 to 76.2
> cm) across. Obviously, this piece is far smaller than the maximum
> engine diameter of 6 feet (1.8 m) or more leading many to draw the
> conclusion that the item is not from a 757 engine.
Der letzte Teilsatz bei mir lautet bei diesem Link:
"all three of these pieces of debris are identical matches to or at
least consistent with the components found in the Rolls-Royce
RB211-535 turbofan aboard a Boeing 757."
> Pisaopfer schrieb am 10. September 2006 18:33
> > http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
>
> zitat aus dieses links:
>
> Based on the sizes of the person standing next to the debris and
> other objects in the photographs that we can use for comparison, we
> estimate that the disk is approximately 25 to 30 inches (63.5 to 76.2
> cm) across. Obviously, this piece is far smaller than the maximum
> engine diameter of 6 feet (1.8 m) or more leading many to draw the
> conclusion that the item is not from a 757 engine.
Der letzte Teilsatz bei mir lautet bei diesem Link:
"all three of these pieces of debris are identical matches to or at
least consistent with the components found in the Rolls-Royce
RB211-535 turbofan aboard a Boeing 757."