KGB schrieb am 10. September 2006 18:40
> Based on the sizes of the person standing next to the debris and
> other objects in the photographs that we can use for comparison, we
> estimate that the disk is approximately 25 to 30 inches (63.5 to 76.2
> cm) across. Obviously, this piece is far smaller than the maximum
> engine diameter of 6 feet (1.8 m) or more leading many to draw the
> conclusion that the item is not from a 757 engine.
Und weiter im nächsten Absatz:
"However, we have already seen that rotating components within a
turbofan engine can vary widely in size."
Danach kommt der Erklärbär und am Schluss die Folgerung, dass es sich
um Teile der RR-Engine handelt.
> Based on the sizes of the person standing next to the debris and
> other objects in the photographs that we can use for comparison, we
> estimate that the disk is approximately 25 to 30 inches (63.5 to 76.2
> cm) across. Obviously, this piece is far smaller than the maximum
> engine diameter of 6 feet (1.8 m) or more leading many to draw the
> conclusion that the item is not from a 757 engine.
Und weiter im nächsten Absatz:
"However, we have already seen that rotating components within a
turbofan engine can vary widely in size."
Danach kommt der Erklärbär und am Schluss die Folgerung, dass es sich
um Teile der RR-Engine handelt.