jos schrieb am 13. Februar 2014 17:17
> Lesen scheint nicht gerade deine Stärke.
> Du gehst gerade einem - diplomatisch ausgedrückt - Rechtsextremisten
> auf dem Leim.
>
> Aber vielleicht stehst du auch auf folgenden völkischem Scheissdreck:
>
> 'Die fast 200 Millionen Toten aus Krieg und Sozialismus wären der
> Welt erspart geblieben, und die freiheitliche Kultur des Westens
> hätte ihren verdienten Rang in der Welt behalten, wenn die Weltmächte
> das deutsche Kulturvolk in seinem angestammten Gebiet hätten leben
> lassen wollen.'
> http://www.heise.de/tp/blogs/foren/S-Re-Reichsbuergers-Narrativ/forum-274513/msg-24764513/read/
Mit Ihrem Zitat meines TP-Beitrags geben Sie das Leitmotiv des New
York Times-Bestsellers von Patrick J. Buchanan wieder:
"Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War
How Britain lost its Empire
and the West lost the World",
New York 2008.
Buchanan war:
"senior adviser to three American presidents;
ran twice for the Republican presidential nomination,
in 1992 and 1996;
and was the Reform Party candidate in 2000.
He is author of nine other books, including seven bestsellers".
> '"Wer Wind sät, wird Sturm ernten."
> (Wer Sturm sät, kann Hitler ernten.)'
> ebenda
"Die Geburtsstätte der nationalsozialistischen Bewegung
war nicht München, sondern Versailles."
(Theodor Heuß, 1. Bundespräsident)
"Ich bin in Versailles geboren."
(Adolf Hitler)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[Edit:]
Auszug aus dem oben aufgeführten Buch von Buchanan:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Why did Britain declare war on Germany, twice?
Neither the Kaiser nor Hitler sought to destroy Britain or her
empire. Both admired what Britain had built. Both sought an alliance
with England. The Kaiser was the eldest grandson of Queen Victoria.
...
In 1907, preparing for the Hague Conference on disarmament, U.S.
Secretary of state Elihu Root sent Ambassador Henry White to London
to ascertain British views. White was "startled" by what he heard
into the stark realization that a European war involving Britain was
a possibility.
Balfour: "We are probably fools not to find a reason for declaring
war on Germany before she builds too many ships and takes away our
trade."
Henry White: "You are a very high minded man in private life. How can
you possibly contemplate anything so politically immoral as provoking
a war against a harmless nation which has as good a right to a navy
as you have? If you wish to compete with German trade, work harder."
Balfour: "That would mean lowering our standard of living. Perhaps it
would be simpler for us to have a war."
White: "I am shocked that you of all men should enunciate such
principles."
Balfour: "Is it a question of right or wrong? Maybe it is just a
question of keeping our supremacy."
...
For Britain, World War I was not a war of necessity but a war of
choice. The Germans did not want war with Britain, nor did they want
to destroy the British Empire. They feared a two-front war against a
rising Russian Empire and a France resolute upon revenge for 1870 and
the loss of Alsace-Lorraine. Berlin would have paid a high price for
British neutrality.
...
As long as Germany remained the greatest power in Europe, Britain
would line up against her. The British policy amounted to a moral
declaration of war on Germany, not because of what she had done, but
because of who she was: the first power in Europe.
...
British hawks looked to a European war to enhance national prestige
and expand the empire. A war in which French and Russian armies tore
at Germany from east and west, as the Royal Navy sent the High Seas
Fleet to the bottom, rolled up the Kaiser’s colonies, and drove
German trade from the high seas seemed a glorious opportunity to
smash the greatest rival to British power since Napoleon.
...
"If Germany had not violated Belgian neutrality in 1914, Britain
would have", writes Niall Ferguson. "This puts the British
government's much-vaunted moral superiority in fighting for Belgian
neutrality in another light.
...
It was the war begun in 1914 and the Paris peace conference of 1919
[in Versailles] that destroyed the German, Austro-Hungarian, and
Russian empires and ushered onto the world stage Lenin, Stalin,
Mussolini, and Hitler. And it was the war begun in September 1939
that led to the slaughter of the Jews and tens of millions of
Christians, the devastation of Europe, Stalinization of half the
continent, the fall of China to Maoist madness, and half a century of
Cold War.
..
That war would give birth to the fanatic and murderous ideologies of
Leninisam, Stalinism, Nazism, and Fascism, and usher in the Second
World War that would bring death to tens of millions more.
And it was Britain that turned both European wars into world wars.
Had Britain not declared war on Germany in 1914, Canada, Australia,
South Africa, New Zwealand, and India would not have followed thre
Mother Country in. Nor would Britain's ally Japan. Nor would Italy,
which London lured in with secret bribes of territory from the
Habsburg and Ottoman empires. Nor would America have gone to war had
Britain stayed out. Germany would have been victorious, perhaps in
months. There would have been no Lenin, no Stalin, no Versailles, no
Hitler, no Holocaust."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mit Blick auf das "Schwarzbuch des Kommunismus" dürfte die Summe von
200 Millionen vermeidbaren Toten aufgrund der Kriegsentscheidung von
1914 nicht übertrieben sein.
> Lesen scheint nicht gerade deine Stärke.
> Du gehst gerade einem - diplomatisch ausgedrückt - Rechtsextremisten
> auf dem Leim.
>
> Aber vielleicht stehst du auch auf folgenden völkischem Scheissdreck:
>
> 'Die fast 200 Millionen Toten aus Krieg und Sozialismus wären der
> Welt erspart geblieben, und die freiheitliche Kultur des Westens
> hätte ihren verdienten Rang in der Welt behalten, wenn die Weltmächte
> das deutsche Kulturvolk in seinem angestammten Gebiet hätten leben
> lassen wollen.'
> http://www.heise.de/tp/blogs/foren/S-Re-Reichsbuergers-Narrativ/forum-274513/msg-24764513/read/
Mit Ihrem Zitat meines TP-Beitrags geben Sie das Leitmotiv des New
York Times-Bestsellers von Patrick J. Buchanan wieder:
"Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War
How Britain lost its Empire
and the West lost the World",
New York 2008.
Buchanan war:
"senior adviser to three American presidents;
ran twice for the Republican presidential nomination,
in 1992 and 1996;
and was the Reform Party candidate in 2000.
He is author of nine other books, including seven bestsellers".
> '"Wer Wind sät, wird Sturm ernten."
> (Wer Sturm sät, kann Hitler ernten.)'
> ebenda
"Die Geburtsstätte der nationalsozialistischen Bewegung
war nicht München, sondern Versailles."
(Theodor Heuß, 1. Bundespräsident)
"Ich bin in Versailles geboren."
(Adolf Hitler)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[Edit:]
Auszug aus dem oben aufgeführten Buch von Buchanan:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Why did Britain declare war on Germany, twice?
Neither the Kaiser nor Hitler sought to destroy Britain or her
empire. Both admired what Britain had built. Both sought an alliance
with England. The Kaiser was the eldest grandson of Queen Victoria.
...
In 1907, preparing for the Hague Conference on disarmament, U.S.
Secretary of state Elihu Root sent Ambassador Henry White to London
to ascertain British views. White was "startled" by what he heard
into the stark realization that a European war involving Britain was
a possibility.
Balfour: "We are probably fools not to find a reason for declaring
war on Germany before she builds too many ships and takes away our
trade."
Henry White: "You are a very high minded man in private life. How can
you possibly contemplate anything so politically immoral as provoking
a war against a harmless nation which has as good a right to a navy
as you have? If you wish to compete with German trade, work harder."
Balfour: "That would mean lowering our standard of living. Perhaps it
would be simpler for us to have a war."
White: "I am shocked that you of all men should enunciate such
principles."
Balfour: "Is it a question of right or wrong? Maybe it is just a
question of keeping our supremacy."
...
For Britain, World War I was not a war of necessity but a war of
choice. The Germans did not want war with Britain, nor did they want
to destroy the British Empire. They feared a two-front war against a
rising Russian Empire and a France resolute upon revenge for 1870 and
the loss of Alsace-Lorraine. Berlin would have paid a high price for
British neutrality.
...
As long as Germany remained the greatest power in Europe, Britain
would line up against her. The British policy amounted to a moral
declaration of war on Germany, not because of what she had done, but
because of who she was: the first power in Europe.
...
British hawks looked to a European war to enhance national prestige
and expand the empire. A war in which French and Russian armies tore
at Germany from east and west, as the Royal Navy sent the High Seas
Fleet to the bottom, rolled up the Kaiser’s colonies, and drove
German trade from the high seas seemed a glorious opportunity to
smash the greatest rival to British power since Napoleon.
...
"If Germany had not violated Belgian neutrality in 1914, Britain
would have", writes Niall Ferguson. "This puts the British
government's much-vaunted moral superiority in fighting for Belgian
neutrality in another light.
...
It was the war begun in 1914 and the Paris peace conference of 1919
[in Versailles] that destroyed the German, Austro-Hungarian, and
Russian empires and ushered onto the world stage Lenin, Stalin,
Mussolini, and Hitler. And it was the war begun in September 1939
that led to the slaughter of the Jews and tens of millions of
Christians, the devastation of Europe, Stalinization of half the
continent, the fall of China to Maoist madness, and half a century of
Cold War.
..
That war would give birth to the fanatic and murderous ideologies of
Leninisam, Stalinism, Nazism, and Fascism, and usher in the Second
World War that would bring death to tens of millions more.
And it was Britain that turned both European wars into world wars.
Had Britain not declared war on Germany in 1914, Canada, Australia,
South Africa, New Zwealand, and India would not have followed thre
Mother Country in. Nor would Britain's ally Japan. Nor would Italy,
which London lured in with secret bribes of territory from the
Habsburg and Ottoman empires. Nor would America have gone to war had
Britain stayed out. Germany would have been victorious, perhaps in
months. There would have been no Lenin, no Stalin, no Versailles, no
Hitler, no Holocaust."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mit Blick auf das "Schwarzbuch des Kommunismus" dürfte die Summe von
200 Millionen vermeidbaren Toten aufgrund der Kriegsentscheidung von
1914 nicht übertrieben sein.