"Israel: State Terrorist attack against Lebanon
Tel Aviv launches terrorist attack against Lebanese civilian
infrastructures after two soldiers are seized
Russia, France and the EU have complained about the disproportionate
use of force by Israel, after Lebanese civilian infrastructures were
targeted by israeli military hardware today. 35 civilians were
murdered in the terrorist attack by Israel, in which the Beirut
International Airport was bombed, several towns were shelled and an
air and sea blockade was imposed in acts of state terrorism and
international piracy.
...
If Israel thinks it is proportionate to use military hardware against
civilians because two soldiers were captured not by the Lebanese Army
but by Hezbollah operationals, who do not have the support of all the
Lebanese Government, it is a clear sign that Tel Aviv these days is
thrashing around in the death throes provoked by decades of
arrogance, as it has lost the hearts and minds of the international
community by refusing to leave the territories it holds illegally
under international law.
If Israel responds to terrorists with terrorism, then it has become a
terrorist state and as such has begun to justify tit-for-tat attacks.
What is the difference between an Israeli civilian being murdered by
a Palestinian or Hezbollah terrorist and a Lebanese civilian being
murdered by an Israeli terrorist?"
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/13-07-2006/83293-israelte
rrorist-0
Da erinnere ich mich an die Umfrage, die vor ca. einem Jahr als
Ergebnis herausbrachte, dass die Mehrheit der befragten Staaten
Israel als die größte Gefahr für den internationalen Frieden ansehen.
Nun tritt Israel mal wieder den Beweis an...
Gruß
Hermes
Tel Aviv launches terrorist attack against Lebanese civilian
infrastructures after two soldiers are seized
Russia, France and the EU have complained about the disproportionate
use of force by Israel, after Lebanese civilian infrastructures were
targeted by israeli military hardware today. 35 civilians were
murdered in the terrorist attack by Israel, in which the Beirut
International Airport was bombed, several towns were shelled and an
air and sea blockade was imposed in acts of state terrorism and
international piracy.
...
If Israel thinks it is proportionate to use military hardware against
civilians because two soldiers were captured not by the Lebanese Army
but by Hezbollah operationals, who do not have the support of all the
Lebanese Government, it is a clear sign that Tel Aviv these days is
thrashing around in the death throes provoked by decades of
arrogance, as it has lost the hearts and minds of the international
community by refusing to leave the territories it holds illegally
under international law.
If Israel responds to terrorists with terrorism, then it has become a
terrorist state and as such has begun to justify tit-for-tat attacks.
What is the difference between an Israeli civilian being murdered by
a Palestinian or Hezbollah terrorist and a Lebanese civilian being
murdered by an Israeli terrorist?"
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/13-07-2006/83293-israelte
rrorist-0
Da erinnere ich mich an die Umfrage, die vor ca. einem Jahr als
Ergebnis herausbrachte, dass die Mehrheit der befragten Staaten
Israel als die größte Gefahr für den internationalen Frieden ansehen.
Nun tritt Israel mal wieder den Beweis an...
Gruß
Hermes