What's Behind the London Attacks?
The bombing of the London Underground was a false-flag operation
designed to keep the West mired in war. Don't believe otherwise.
By Matt Hutaff
...
Unlike four years ago, however, I refuse to accept that the attack on
London was anything less than a false-flag operation designed to
enrage Western "civilization" against the Middle East. Why? Because
there is no reason for "terrorist" groups to attack England. As
recently as this week, the Ministry of Defense announced that plans
were being drafted that would pull British armed forces from the
quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan. With the British effectively
admitting they're throwing in the towel, the only motivation to stay
could come from an attack that compels the forces to stay and fight
"global terrorism."
Think about it. The attack only benefits empires desperate to
maintain a foothold in the Middle East without further eroding public
opinion. Will Parliament shrug their shoulders and push their
soldiers into longer tours of duty because of this? Obviously it's
too early to tell, but if that happens, insurgents and rebels will
have lost more than they could have ever possibly gained in
destroying part of the Underground.
Brian Kilmeade of Fox News agrees, claiming the sabotage "works to
... [the] Western world's advantage, for people to experience
something like this together." It doesn't just make "terrorism" an
American problem. It makes it a worldwide problem. The Number One
problem.
> http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0889_what_behind_london_attacks.html
The bombing of the London Underground was a false-flag operation
designed to keep the West mired in war. Don't believe otherwise.
By Matt Hutaff
...
Unlike four years ago, however, I refuse to accept that the attack on
London was anything less than a false-flag operation designed to
enrage Western "civilization" against the Middle East. Why? Because
there is no reason for "terrorist" groups to attack England. As
recently as this week, the Ministry of Defense announced that plans
were being drafted that would pull British armed forces from the
quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan. With the British effectively
admitting they're throwing in the towel, the only motivation to stay
could come from an attack that compels the forces to stay and fight
"global terrorism."
Think about it. The attack only benefits empires desperate to
maintain a foothold in the Middle East without further eroding public
opinion. Will Parliament shrug their shoulders and push their
soldiers into longer tours of duty because of this? Obviously it's
too early to tell, but if that happens, insurgents and rebels will
have lost more than they could have ever possibly gained in
destroying part of the Underground.
Brian Kilmeade of Fox News agrees, claiming the sabotage "works to
... [the] Western world's advantage, for people to experience
something like this together." It doesn't just make "terrorism" an
American problem. It makes it a worldwide problem. The Number One
problem.
> http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0889_what_behind_london_attacks.html