Worum es dem US-Imperium geht, kann man seit Jahrzehnten in öffentlich zugänglichen Strategiepapieren nachlesen. Finanziert wird dies durch unbegrenzten Dollarkredit.
"Excerpts From Pentagon's Plan: 'Prevent the Re-Emergence of a New Rival'
...
Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power. These regions include Western Europe, East Asia, the territory of the former Soviet Union, and Southwest Asia.
There are three additional aspects to this objective: First, the U.S. must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests. Second, in the non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. Finally, we must maintain the mechanisms for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role. An effective reconstitution capability is important here, since it implies that a potential rival could not hope to quickly or easily gain a predominant military position in the world.
...
access to vital raw materials, primarily Persian Gulf oil;"
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/08/world/excerpts-from-pentagon-s-plan
-prevent-the-re-emergence-of-a-new-rival.html
The Project for a “New Middle East”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/The%20Project%20for%20the%20New%20Middle%20East.jpg
"John Kerry says partition of Syria could be part of ‘plan B’ if peace talks fail"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/23/john-kerry-partition-syria-peace-talks
"First published From Parameters, Summer 1997, pp. 4-14: US Army War College
...
There will be no peace. At any given moment for the rest of our lifetimes, there will be multiple conflicts in mutating forms around the globe. Violent conflict will dominate the headlines, but cultural and economic struggles will be steadier and ultimately more decisive. The de facto role of the US armed forces will be to keep the world safe for our economy and open to our cultural assault. To those ends, we will do a fair amount of killing."
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3011.htm
Wesley Clark:
"And he said, but one thing we did learn, he said, we learned that we can use our military in the region in the Middle East and the Soviets wont stop us. He said, and we have got about five or ten years to clean up those all Soviet client regimes; Syria, Iran, Iraq, - before the next great super power comes on to challenge us."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TY2DKzastu8&t=220
"Generalstabsoffizier Reinhard Herden, Bereichsleiter für Analysen
und Risikoprognosen des Amtes für Nachrichtenwesen der Bundeswehr,
nach intensivem Gedankenaustausch mit Angehörigen der
US-amerikanischen Military Intelligence Community in einem
offiziellen Organ der Bundeswehr bereits 1996
...
«Das 21. Jahrhundert wird die Ära eines neuen Kolonialismus sein ...
Die Kolonien der Zukunft werden vor allem Ressourcenlieferanten und
Absatzmärkte für die Kolonialmächte sein. ... Die Regierungen der
reichen Staaten werden physische und digitale Sicherheitskorridore
für den Abtransport von Bodenschätzen und den Handel sowie zu
Informationszwecken einrichten und überwachen.»"
http://www.ag-friedensforschung.de/themen/Bundeswehr/woit.html
“We have about 50% of the world’s wealth but only 6.3% of its
population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security.To do so,we will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our immediate national objectives.We need not deceive ourselves that we can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction.”
- George Kennan, US State Department senior planning official, 1948
"Thomas Jefferson, the most forthcoming of the founding fathers, said, “We shall drive them [the savages] — We shall drive them with the beasts of the forests into the stony mountains,” and the country will ultimately be “free of blot or mixture” — meaning red or black. It wasn’t quite achieved, but that was the goal. Furthermore, Jefferson went on, “Our new nation will be the nest from which America, north and south, is to be peopled,” displacing not only the red men here but the Latin-speaking population to the south and anyone else who happened to be around."
https://chomsky.info/20080424/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIKNUTJr-Fw&t=55m30s
"Empire Without End
...
David Ramsay, South Carolina's delegate to the Continental Congress, wrote as early as 1778 that the grandeur of the American continent provided the basis for a realm that would make "the Macedonian, the Roman, and the British sink into insignificance." George Washington thought of the new country as a "rising" or an "infant" empire. Thomas Jefferson, who secured the vast Mississippi and Missouri valley corridors, famously envisaged an "empire of liberty.""
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2010-07-01/empire-without-end
Madison 1787: "protect the minority of the opulent against the majority".
https://www.heise.de/forum/p-29405554/
"Victory is Possible
by Colin S. Gray and Keith Payne
...
The United States should plan to defeat the Soviet Union and to do so at a cost that would not prohibit U.S. recovery. Washington should identify war aims that in the last resort would contemplate the destruction of Soviet political authority and the emergence of a postwar world order compatible with Western values."
https://www.heise.de/forum/p-29960521/
"The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy
...
If the United States launched a nuclear attack against Russia (or China), the targeted country would be left with a tiny surviving arsenal -- if any at all. At that point, even a relatively modest or inefficient missile-defense system might well be enough to protect against any retaliatory strikes, because the devastated enemy would have so few warheads and decoys left."
http://web.archive.org/web/20060406055430/http://www.foreignaffairs.o
rg/20060301faessay85204/keir-a-lieber-daryl-g-press/the-rise-of-u-s-n
uclear-primacy.html?mode=print
US-Memorandum 1945:
"In Saudi Arabia, where the oil resources constitute a stupendous source of strategic power, and one of the greatest material prizes in world history"
http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/FRUS/FRUS-idx?type=goto&id=FRUS.FRUS1945v08&isize=M&submit=Go+to+page&page=45