Sinnentstellend zitiert.....

Joshi schrieb am 27.10.2021 11:37:

Quelle:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027511/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-42.pdf
Seite 13, die letzten beiden Spalten

Ernst gemeinte Frage: Wie erklärt ihr euch dieses Phänomen? Die einzigen möglichen Erklärungen, die mir auf Anhieb einfallen, sind:

Warum raetst du?
Lies doch einfach den von dir zititeren Artikel, anstelle wahrlos einzelne Werte aus dem Zusammenhang zu reissen.

Da steht viel ueber die Wirksamkeit der Impfung und auch wie die Daten zu interpretieren sind:

n individuals aged greater than 30, the rate of a positive COVID-19 test is higher in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated. This is likely to be due to a variety of reasons, including differences in the population of vaccinated and unvaccinated people as well as differences in testing patterns.
...
The case rates in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are crude rates that do not take into account underlying statistical biases in the data. There are likely to be systematic differences in who chooses to be tested and the COVID risk of people who are vaccinated. These biases become more evident as more people are vaccinated and the differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated population become systematically different in ways that are not accounted for without undertaken formal analysis of vaccine effectiveness as is made clear.

Oder ganz plakativ unwissenschaftlich:
Wer leugnet, dass es Covid-19 gibt oder denkt es waere kein Problem, wird sich weder impfen noch testen lassen.