oder einen Diktator wie in Bosnien in Minsk installiert. Die
Bevölkerung Weißrusslands gehört zur Endverwertung in die fähigen
Hände von Mädchenhändlern, Organräubern und NATO-Generälen.
Lukaschenko darf den Weißrussen diese Freiheiten, mit denen die
"westliche Wertegemeinschaft" Osteuropa seit Jahrzehnten beglückt,
nicht länger vorenthalten.
Ich schlage vor, die NATO schickt beim nächsten Mal Flugzeugträger
als Wahlbeobachter so wie 2000 bei den Wahlen in Jugoslawien. FHO und
CIA scheitern sonst wieder.
"NATO-Staaten schließen den Ring
Truppen werden um Jugoslawien konzentriert. Drohung mit Militärschlag
Schon vor Abschluß der Wahl in Jugoslawien am Sonntag riefen NATO und
EU gemeinsam mit der von ihnen teuer bezahlten jugoslawischen
Opposition »Wahlbetrug«. Denn falls der NATO-Kandidat Kostunica
verlieren sollte, dann wäre die Wahl von Milosevic manipuliert und
könne folglich von EU und NATO nicht anerkannt werden. Um dies auch
durchzusetzen - so die Überlegung der westlichen Wertegemeinschaft -
mußte die NATO erneut ihre humanitäre Kriegsmaschine rund um
Jugoslawien konzentrieren und in Alarmbereitschaft versetzen.
..."
http://web.archive.org/web/20030520042903/http://www.jungewelt.de/200
0/09-26/005.shtml
"Fremde Heere Ost" vs. Weißrussland:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060904202727/http://geheim-magazin.de/ar
tikel.php?wert=186
Ex-BND-Chef Wieck fordert 14 Millionen Euro für den Putsch:
"Radio Deutsche Welle wieder in Angriffsposition"
> http://www.heise.de/tp/foren/forum-142954/msg-15464038/read/
Geplanter Staatsstreich in Weißrussland aufgedeckt
http://de.rian.ru/world/20060302/43880683.html
"THE US Embassy in Belarus has admitted that it is pursuing a policy
similar to that in 1980s Nicaragua, in which anti-government Contra
rebels were funded and supported."
> http://web.archive.org/web/20010923045159/http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,3-2001303768,00.html
"A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Minsk told The Times that the
embassy helped to fund 300 non-governmental organizations and
admitted that «some» of them were linked to those who were “seeking
political change”. “Helped” is certainly an understatement here.
Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty was more precise: “Many groups in
Belarus rely on foreign money for their activities”. Christian
Science Monitor revealed that Washington spent $24 million in 2000 to
support NGOs and opposition groups in Belarus, and was going to spend
even more next year. According to Russian press, support to
Belarussian opposition through the Eurasia Foundation, for instance,
grew from $340,000 in 1996 to $1.5 million in 1998, and to about $4
million in 2001. That’s in a country where National Bank reserves do
not exceed $200 million!
To what extent such groups in Belarus, created and funded by the
U.S., can be considered “independent” (i.e. “not governed by a
foreign power; self-governing; free from the influence, guidance, or
control of another or others; self-reliant”) is certainly a big
question. To look at this from a more concrete perspective, 300
Washington-funded NGOs is one organization for every 34,000 citizens
of a 10-million person republic. What would be the reaction of
American people and the Bush Administration if some foreign country
(for instance, Saudi Arabia, North Korea or Russia) would set up and
provide multibillion funding to some 8,250 “civil society” groups
(one for every 34,000 Americans) aimed at “seeking political change”
(read: “overthrowing the President”, “changing the political regime”)
in the U.S.?"
http://web.archive.org/web/20040923163428/http://www.untimely-thought
s.com/index.html?cat=3&type=3&art=779
Bevölkerung Weißrusslands gehört zur Endverwertung in die fähigen
Hände von Mädchenhändlern, Organräubern und NATO-Generälen.
Lukaschenko darf den Weißrussen diese Freiheiten, mit denen die
"westliche Wertegemeinschaft" Osteuropa seit Jahrzehnten beglückt,
nicht länger vorenthalten.
Ich schlage vor, die NATO schickt beim nächsten Mal Flugzeugträger
als Wahlbeobachter so wie 2000 bei den Wahlen in Jugoslawien. FHO und
CIA scheitern sonst wieder.
"NATO-Staaten schließen den Ring
Truppen werden um Jugoslawien konzentriert. Drohung mit Militärschlag
Schon vor Abschluß der Wahl in Jugoslawien am Sonntag riefen NATO und
EU gemeinsam mit der von ihnen teuer bezahlten jugoslawischen
Opposition »Wahlbetrug«. Denn falls der NATO-Kandidat Kostunica
verlieren sollte, dann wäre die Wahl von Milosevic manipuliert und
könne folglich von EU und NATO nicht anerkannt werden. Um dies auch
durchzusetzen - so die Überlegung der westlichen Wertegemeinschaft -
mußte die NATO erneut ihre humanitäre Kriegsmaschine rund um
Jugoslawien konzentrieren und in Alarmbereitschaft versetzen.
..."
http://web.archive.org/web/20030520042903/http://www.jungewelt.de/200
0/09-26/005.shtml
"Fremde Heere Ost" vs. Weißrussland:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060904202727/http://geheim-magazin.de/ar
tikel.php?wert=186
Ex-BND-Chef Wieck fordert 14 Millionen Euro für den Putsch:
"Radio Deutsche Welle wieder in Angriffsposition"
> http://www.heise.de/tp/foren/forum-142954/msg-15464038/read/
Geplanter Staatsstreich in Weißrussland aufgedeckt
http://de.rian.ru/world/20060302/43880683.html
"THE US Embassy in Belarus has admitted that it is pursuing a policy
similar to that in 1980s Nicaragua, in which anti-government Contra
rebels were funded and supported."
> http://web.archive.org/web/20010923045159/http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,3-2001303768,00.html
"A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Minsk told The Times that the
embassy helped to fund 300 non-governmental organizations and
admitted that «some» of them were linked to those who were “seeking
political change”. “Helped” is certainly an understatement here.
Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty was more precise: “Many groups in
Belarus rely on foreign money for their activities”. Christian
Science Monitor revealed that Washington spent $24 million in 2000 to
support NGOs and opposition groups in Belarus, and was going to spend
even more next year. According to Russian press, support to
Belarussian opposition through the Eurasia Foundation, for instance,
grew from $340,000 in 1996 to $1.5 million in 1998, and to about $4
million in 2001. That’s in a country where National Bank reserves do
not exceed $200 million!
To what extent such groups in Belarus, created and funded by the
U.S., can be considered “independent” (i.e. “not governed by a
foreign power; self-governing; free from the influence, guidance, or
control of another or others; self-reliant”) is certainly a big
question. To look at this from a more concrete perspective, 300
Washington-funded NGOs is one organization for every 34,000 citizens
of a 10-million person republic. What would be the reaction of
American people and the Bush Administration if some foreign country
(for instance, Saudi Arabia, North Korea or Russia) would set up and
provide multibillion funding to some 8,250 “civil society” groups
(one for every 34,000 Americans) aimed at “seeking political change”
(read: “overthrowing the President”, “changing the political regime”)
in the U.S.?"
http://web.archive.org/web/20040923163428/http://www.untimely-thought
s.com/index.html?cat=3&type=3&art=779