joker7777777 schrieb am 17. Februar 2014 03:37
>
> Wenn dem so ist, dann liegt der Opportunismus in der Natur einer
> Partei? Oder ist jede Partei auf Dauer korrumpierbar?
Eine Partei, die im herrschen System an die Macht will, muss sich
diesem letztlich fügen, dass wurde in [1] für Deutschland schön
aufgezeigt, d.h. jede Partei, die sich nicht der
Fundamentalopposition verschreib, muss opportunistisch sein.
Am besten ist das vielleicht hier zusammengefasst [2]:
"Our Socialist perceives that he is regarded as a laughing stock [by
the other politicians] . . . and finds more and more difficulty in
securing the floor. . . he knows that neither by his talk nor by his
vote can he influence the proceedings . . . His speeches don't even
reach the public . . . He appeals to the voters to elect more
comrades. . . Years pass . . . [and a] number . . . are elected. Each
of them goes through the same experience . . . [and] quickly come to
the conclusion . . . [that they] must show that they are practical
men . . . that they are doing something for their constituency . . .
In this manner the situation compels them to take a 'practical' part
in the proceedings, to 'talk business,' to fall in line with the
matters actually dealt with in the legislative body . . . Spending
years in that atmosphere, enjoying good jobs and pay, the elected
Socialists have themselves become part and parcel of the political
machinery . . . With growing success in elections and securing
political power they turn more and more conservative and content with
existing conditions. Removal from the life and suffering of the
working class, living in the atmosphere of the bourgeoisie . . . they
have become what they call 'practical' . . . Power and position have
gradually stifled their conscience and they have not the strength and
honesty to swim against the current . . . They have become the
strongest bulwark of capitalism." [What is Anarchism?, pp. 92-8]"
Im übrigen gibt es da die Artikelserie "Eine Demokratie haben wir
schon lange nicht mehr" [3].
[1] http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/33/33455/1.html
[2] http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionJ2#secj22
[3] http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/40/40546/1.html
>
> Wenn dem so ist, dann liegt der Opportunismus in der Natur einer
> Partei? Oder ist jede Partei auf Dauer korrumpierbar?
Eine Partei, die im herrschen System an die Macht will, muss sich
diesem letztlich fügen, dass wurde in [1] für Deutschland schön
aufgezeigt, d.h. jede Partei, die sich nicht der
Fundamentalopposition verschreib, muss opportunistisch sein.
Am besten ist das vielleicht hier zusammengefasst [2]:
"Our Socialist perceives that he is regarded as a laughing stock [by
the other politicians] . . . and finds more and more difficulty in
securing the floor. . . he knows that neither by his talk nor by his
vote can he influence the proceedings . . . His speeches don't even
reach the public . . . He appeals to the voters to elect more
comrades. . . Years pass . . . [and a] number . . . are elected. Each
of them goes through the same experience . . . [and] quickly come to
the conclusion . . . [that they] must show that they are practical
men . . . that they are doing something for their constituency . . .
In this manner the situation compels them to take a 'practical' part
in the proceedings, to 'talk business,' to fall in line with the
matters actually dealt with in the legislative body . . . Spending
years in that atmosphere, enjoying good jobs and pay, the elected
Socialists have themselves become part and parcel of the political
machinery . . . With growing success in elections and securing
political power they turn more and more conservative and content with
existing conditions. Removal from the life and suffering of the
working class, living in the atmosphere of the bourgeoisie . . . they
have become what they call 'practical' . . . Power and position have
gradually stifled their conscience and they have not the strength and
honesty to swim against the current . . . They have become the
strongest bulwark of capitalism." [What is Anarchism?, pp. 92-8]"
Im übrigen gibt es da die Artikelserie "Eine Demokratie haben wir
schon lange nicht mehr" [3].
[1] http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/33/33455/1.html
[2] http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionJ2#secj22
[3] http://www.heise.de/tp/artikel/40/40546/1.html