Leo_Plegger schrieb am 27. November 2003 11:37
> Die Zahl wird nirgends hinterfragt, sondern als wahr
> hingenommen, ebenso der direkte Zusammenhang.
Hier ist ein kritischer Artikel der die Zahl hinterfragt:
Counting Iraq's victims
Dead babies always figure heavily in atrocity propaganda, and Osama
bin Laden is merely the latest to exploit them. But what is the
truth?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/analysis/story/0,3604,566795,00.html
Zitat:
Unicef said: "If the substantial reduction in child mortality
throughout Iraq during the 1980s had continued through the 1990s,
there would have been half a million fewer deaths of children under
five in the country as a whole in the eight year period 1991 to
1998."
Saddam blames sanctions, while the US blames Saddam. But however
theoretical the figures, and however debatable the reasons, it seems
hard to dispute that babies are dying unnecessarily.
> Die Zahl wird nirgends hinterfragt, sondern als wahr
> hingenommen, ebenso der direkte Zusammenhang.
Hier ist ein kritischer Artikel der die Zahl hinterfragt:
Counting Iraq's victims
Dead babies always figure heavily in atrocity propaganda, and Osama
bin Laden is merely the latest to exploit them. But what is the
truth?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/analysis/story/0,3604,566795,00.html
Zitat:
Unicef said: "If the substantial reduction in child mortality
throughout Iraq during the 1980s had continued through the 1990s,
there would have been half a million fewer deaths of children under
five in the country as a whole in the eight year period 1991 to
1998."
Saddam blames sanctions, while the US blames Saddam. But however
theoretical the figures, and however debatable the reasons, it seems
hard to dispute that babies are dying unnecessarily.