only_me schrieb am 28.06.2024 19:53:
Jetzt sind sicher die Amis daran Schuld, dass Putin ein fremdes Land überfallen hat?
Ganz offensichtlich sind die USA schuldig der völkerrechtswidrigen Einmischung in die inneren Angelegenheiten Russlands und etlicher anderer Staaten des ehemaligen Ostblocks aber auch in Südamerika und Afrika.
Sie verstoßen insbesonders gegen die UN Charta und deren Konkretisierung durch die Resolution 2131 (XX), die auch vom ICJ z.B. im Fall Nicaragua vs. USA herangezogen wurde.
Of particular note are the following paragraphs of resolution 2131 (XX):
1. No State has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any State. Consequently, armed intervention and all other forms of interference or attempted threats against the personality of the State or against its political, economic and cultural elements, are condemned.
2. No State may use or encourage the use of economic, political or any other type of measures to coerce another State in order to obtain from it the subordination of the exercise of its sovereign rights or to secure from it advantages of any kind. Also, no State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist, or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State.
3. The use of force to deprive peoples of their national identity constitutes a violation of their inalienable rights and of the principle of non-intervention.
[...]
5. Every State has an inalienable right to choose its political, economic, social and cultural systems, without interference in any form by another State.
6. All States shall respect the right of self-determination and independence of peoples and nations, to be freely expressed without any foreign pressure, and with absolute respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. Consequently, all States shall contribute to the complete elimination of racial discrimination and colonialism in all its forms and manifestations.”
(...)
In the mid-1980s, the International Court of Justice, seized of the issue by the Nicaraguan Government which had complained of active military, logistical and other support by the United States to Contras rebel groups within Nicaraguan territories and to other actions including the United States’ mining of Nicaraguan ports and coastal waters, referred in its Judgement, inter alia, to resolution 2131 (XX) (Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua, I.C.J. Reports, 1986, p. 107, para. 203).The new life of resolution 2131 (XX) as part of a general scientific and legal re-examination and restatement, in more contemporary terms than the old classical international law of the right to self-determination, political and economic, free from unilateral interventions or threats thereof by other States or groups of States was perhaps demonstrated in the political aftermath to the NATO armed intervention against the former Yugoslavia in early 1999, without any prior enabling legal resolution from the Security Council.
https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ga_2131-xx/ga_2131-xx.html