DrM schrieb am 21.04.2023 17:30:
PippiLangstrumpf schrieb am 21.04.2023 15:26:
Und in Häusern wohnen ja auch Soldaten.
Ich meine hier im Forum schon gelesen zu haben, daß die Bombardierung von Krankenhäusern legitim wäre, weil die zur Heilung von Soldaten dienen könnten.
Hier zum beispiel:
https://www.msf.org/kunduz-hospital-attack
Ein AC-130 Gunship hat fast eine Stunde lang auf das krankenhaus gefeuert (dessen position bekannt war) und so beschädigt das es nicht mehr benutzt werden konnte. Das kommunikationsystem vom flugzeug ist lt. eigenen berichten genau zu der zeit des Angriffes bedauerlicherweise ausgefallen.
Um nachher bei der aufklärung zu helfen ist später gepanzertes fahrzeug eingedrungen und hat beweise vernichtet...
Starting at 2:08am on Saturday 3 October, a United States AC-130 gunship fired 211 shells on the main hospital building where patients were sleeping in their beds or being operated on in the operating theatre.
At least 42 people were killed, including 24 patients, 14 staff and 4 caretakers. Thirty-seven people were injured.
Our patients burned in their beds, our medical staff were decapitated or lost limbs. Others were shot from the air while they fled the burning building.
The attack from the air lasted for around one hour. The main hospital building came under precise and repeated airstrikes, while the surrounding buildings were left mostly untouched.
Throughout the airstrikes our teams desperately called military authorities to stop the attack.
The Afghan Interior Ministry spokesman Sediq Sediqi confirmed an airstrike on 3 October, saying that "10–15 terrorists were hiding in the hospital" and confirming that hospital workers had been killed. The Afghan Ministry of Defense and a representative of the police chief in Kunduz also said that Taliban fighters were hiding in the hospital compound at the time of the attack, the latter claiming that they were using it as a human shield.
Das Posting wurde vom Benutzer editiert (22.04.2023 12:46).