Anton Flegar schrieb am 23.12.2024 10:37:
Wie war das denn möglich, wenn der Westen die Ukraine dazu gezwungen hat, die Verhandlungen abzubrechen?
Wenn ich die Suchmaschine benutze, komme ich zu keinem anderen Entschluss. Es scheint eher, dass Sie zeitlich nicht korrekt liegen.
Die Verhandlungen wurden erst abgebrochen, nachdem Russland im Vertragsentwurf vom 15. April 2022 eine Klausel eingefügt hatte, in der es sich ein Vetorecht gegen die Aktivierung des Sicherheitsbeistands durch die Garantiestaaten eingeräumt hätte. Das war laut New York Times der Grund für den Abbruch der Verhandlungen von Seiten der Ukraine. Die Klausel kann man im Vertragsentwurf nachlesen.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/15/world/europe/ukraine-russia-ceasefire-deal.html
"The biggest problem, however, came in Article 5. It stated that, in the event of another armed attack on Ukraine, the “guarantor states” that would sign the treaty — Great Britain, China, Russia, the United States and France — would come to Ukraine’s defense.
To the Ukrainians’ dismay, there was a crucial departure from what Ukrainian negotiators said was discussed in Istanbul. Russia inserted a clause saying that all guarantor states, including Russia, had to approve the response if Ukraine were attacked. In effect, Moscow could invade Ukraine again and then veto any military intervention on Ukraine’s behalf — a seemingly absurd condition that Kyiv quickly identified as a dealbreaker.
Russia tried to secure a veto on Ukraine’s security guarantees by inserting a clause requiring unanimous consent.
“The Guarantor States and Ukraine agree that in the event of an armed attack on Ukraine, each of the Guarantor States … on the basis of a decision agreed upon by all Guarantor States, will provide … assistance to Ukraine, as a permanently neutral state under attack…”
With that change, a member of the Ukrainian negotiating team said, “we had no interest in continuing the talks.”"