Woody Box schrieb am 07.11.2016 01:01:
in den Emails von Weiners Computer sei nichts gefunden worden, was eine Anklage rechtfertigen würde.
https://www.rt.com/usa/365568-fbi-charges-clinton-emails/
Ich frage mich, wie das zu den Anündigungen über große Enthüllungen passt, die es letzte Woche von verschiedenenen Seiten gab:
NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails: Money Laundering, Sex Crimes with Children, Child Exploitation, Pay to Play, Perjury
New York Police Department detectives and prosecutors working an alleged underage sexting case against former Congressman Anthony Weiner have turned over a newly-found laptop he shared with wife Huma Abedin to the FBI with enough evidence “to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life,” NYPD sources told True Pundit.
http://truepundit.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
Over the next few days many new documents will be released. The contents of these documents will contain evidence of perhaps the largest coverup in American History. Before this happens we would like to explain ourselves and answer a few questions you may have.
Until this month, WikiLeaks and Anonymous have worked together in building an efficient, detailed, comprehensive set of documents that would be responsible for the incarceration of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and 21 individuals ranging from the DNC, FBI, CIA, and Clinton foundation. These documents will show without a doubt, evidence of Treason, Obstruction of Justice, Election Fraud/Manipulation, and Bribery.
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/95833740
Wenn Clinton-Gegner dahinterstecken, wieso liefern sie nichts oder halten einfach die Klappe, wenn sie nichts liefern können?
Oder hat die Clinton-Seite hier über Bande gespielt und haltlose Behauptungen aufgestellt, um sie anschließend widerlegen zu können?