Re: Der Einsatz von Uran-Munition ließe sich leicht verhindern

Saul Goodmen schrieb am 06.09.2023 09:40:

ADie schrieb am 06.09.2023 09:33:

indem die russischen Truppen sich einfach von ukrainischem Territorium zurückziehen.

und die Ukrainer aufhören Zivilisten im Donezk mit Streubomben zu beschießen

von Human Rights Watch
http://www.the-monitor.org/en-gb/reports/2023/cluster-munition-monitor-2023.aspx

Soll das ein Argument sein?
Aus dem Report:

"Russia has used cluster munitions repeatedly in Ukraine since invading the country
on 24 February 2022"

"Russia continued to produce new cluster munitions in 2022, including at least two
newly developed types that its forces have used in Ukraine since early 2022."

"Since Russia’s all-out invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, Russian forces have used cluster munitions extensively, causing civilian casualties, damaging civilian infrastructure, and contaminating agricultural land."

"UNGA Resolution on the Convention on Cluster Munitions
Russia again voted against the resolution, making it the only country to do so in 2022."

"Russia repeated its argument that cluster munitions are “legitimate weapons”
that are “only harmful when misused.”"

"Past use of cluster munitions:
Russia Afghanistan (as USSR), Georgia, Syria, Ukraine, Chechnya"

"Russia has generally avoided admitting using cluster munitions in Ukraine and has sought to draw attention elsewhere."

GIb zu, du hast die Studie irgendwo gefunden und dachtest, sie helfe dir in der Argumentation, ohne sie aber glesen zu haben, denn Donetsk wird darin gar nicht erwähnt.