Quelle sagt etwas ganz anderes

"We develop two elated arguments concerning the impact of lethal aid on post-conflict societies. One concerns the likelihood of conflict recurring, while the second concerns the level of repression that societies will suffer at the hands of the regime. We argue that lethal aid should lower the likelihood of conflict recurrence, while at the same time leading to higher levels of repression and human rights violations."

Die Studie beschäftigt sich mit den Auswirkungen von Waffenlieferungen nach kriegerischen Konflikten, es geht um Bürgerkriege und autokratische Regimes.

"What are the effects of foreign military assistance on the quality of the peace in post-conflict countries? Security assistance could help a post-conflict government establish a monopoly on the legitimate use of force within the state, leading to a more durable peace and greater human security. On the other hand, foreign military aid might decrease incentives for good governance, weaken civilian control over the armed forces, and provide regimes with more effective tools of repression. Despite the stakes and the tremendous amount of foreign military aid flowing to governments of post-conflict countries, the academic literature provides little guidance as to what policymakers and practitioners should expect the effects of this aid to be. How does the provision of weapons, financing, training, advising, and other forms of military assistance affect the quality of the peace in countries struggling to recover from internal armed conflict?"

Wenn das der "Beweis" dafür sein soll, daß Waffenlieferungen an die Ukraine den Krieg verlängern, kann ich mich nur in meiner Meinung bestätigt fühlen, daß das Gegenteil der Fall ist: Mangelnde Unterstützung der Ukraine gegen den deutlich überlegenen Aggressor hat den Krieg auf jetzt drei Jahre verlängert.