Bleyfuß schrieb am 27. Oktober 2010 15:26
> Ich sehe das anders. Dein Posting ist dummes Getroll und mit
> Modellen, an denen Supercomputer monatelang herumrechnen, nicht
> vergleichbar.
Dein Posting ist noch nicht einmal das. Spar Dir Deine persönlichen
Ausfälle doch einfach, wenn Du nichts zu Sache zu sagen hast; oder
glaubst Du etwa ernsthaft, dass sich jemand für Dein selbstgefälliges
Blabla interessiert?
Widerlege mich doch und bringe Beispiele für Warmist-Prognosen, die
sich erfüllt haben. Ist doch bestimmt ganz einfach, bei den vielen
Simulationen, die da weltweit laufen und letztlich - wie Du - nur
eines produzieren: heisse Luft.
> Wenn du Computersimulationen nicht magst, dann nimm doch einfach die
> globalen Messwerte. Hauptsache, du hörst auf, Unsinn zu posten.
Die globalen Meßwerte, die zeigen, dass die Erwärmung stagniert? Oder
meinst Du vielleicht irgendwelche per cherry-picking ermittelten
"Meßwerte"?
http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/16/iearussia-hadley-center-probably-t
ampered-with-russian-climate-data/
http://en.rian.ru/papers/20091216/157260660.html
"Climategate has already affected Russia. On Tuesday, the
Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report
claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the
headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon,
England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.
The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not
substantiate the anthropogenic global-warming theory.
Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the
country's territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data
submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports.
Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature
calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of
meteorological stations and observations.
The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley
Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not
show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early
21st century.
The HadCRUT database includes specific stations providing incomplete
data and highlighting the global-warming process, rather than
stations facilitating uninterrupted observations.
On the whole, climatologists use the incomplete findings of
meteorological stations far more often than those providing complete
observations.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in
large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming
effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.
The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature
distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world's land mass.
The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature
data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Global-temperature data will have to be modified if similar
climate-date procedures have been used from other national data
because the calculations used by COP15 analysts, including financial
calculations, are based on HadCRUT research."
"A Cherry-Picker's Guide to Temperature Trends (down, flat–even up)"
http://www.masterresource.org/2009/10/a-cherry-pickers-guide-to-tempe
rature-trends/
> Ich sehe das anders. Dein Posting ist dummes Getroll und mit
> Modellen, an denen Supercomputer monatelang herumrechnen, nicht
> vergleichbar.
Dein Posting ist noch nicht einmal das. Spar Dir Deine persönlichen
Ausfälle doch einfach, wenn Du nichts zu Sache zu sagen hast; oder
glaubst Du etwa ernsthaft, dass sich jemand für Dein selbstgefälliges
Blabla interessiert?
Widerlege mich doch und bringe Beispiele für Warmist-Prognosen, die
sich erfüllt haben. Ist doch bestimmt ganz einfach, bei den vielen
Simulationen, die da weltweit laufen und letztlich - wie Du - nur
eines produzieren: heisse Luft.
> Wenn du Computersimulationen nicht magst, dann nimm doch einfach die
> globalen Messwerte. Hauptsache, du hörst auf, Unsinn zu posten.
Die globalen Meßwerte, die zeigen, dass die Erwärmung stagniert? Oder
meinst Du vielleicht irgendwelche per cherry-picking ermittelten
"Meßwerte"?
http://climateaudit.org/2009/12/16/iearussia-hadley-center-probably-t
ampered-with-russian-climate-data/
http://en.rian.ru/papers/20091216/157260660.html
"Climategate has already affected Russia. On Tuesday, the
Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report
claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the
headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon,
England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.
The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not
substantiate the anthropogenic global-warming theory.
Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the
country's territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data
submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports.
Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature
calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of
meteorological stations and observations.
The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley
Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not
show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early
21st century.
The HadCRUT database includes specific stations providing incomplete
data and highlighting the global-warming process, rather than
stations facilitating uninterrupted observations.
On the whole, climatologists use the incomplete findings of
meteorological stations far more often than those providing complete
observations.
IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in
large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming
effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.
The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature
distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world's land mass.
The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature
data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Global-temperature data will have to be modified if similar
climate-date procedures have been used from other national data
because the calculations used by COP15 analysts, including financial
calculations, are based on HadCRUT research."
"A Cherry-Picker's Guide to Temperature Trends (down, flat–even up)"
http://www.masterresource.org/2009/10/a-cherry-pickers-guide-to-tempe
rature-trends/