Ansicht umschalten
Avatar von plausibel
  • plausibel

mehr als 1000 Beiträge seit 05.11.2018

Herr Alt hat den kühlen Kopf leider verloren, den er ...

.... uns bei Angst empfiehlt. Daher ist er leider nicht mehr in der Lage, den Unterschied zwischen Warnung und Drohung zu erkennen.

Und zweitens verkennt er, dass die Ukrainer fast landesweit im Dunkeln sitzen und den Verlust von 1/6 ihres Territoriums betrauern und nicht Russland oder Putin. Man ist daher nicht Realist, wenn man Putin am Ende sieht:

"Es besteht die reale Gefahr, dass Putin versucht, sein Ende mit der Wahnsinnstat des Einsatzes von Atomwaffen abzuwenden. Wer diese Gefahr nicht sieht, ist kein Realist".

Wer wissen will, warum Putins Aussagen auch nach der hundertsten dahingehenden Behauptung keine Drohung mit dem Einsatz von Atomwaffen sind, hört sich einfach an, was er zu sagen hat. Ich zitiere mal auszugsweise:

"The West has gone too far in its aggressive anti-Russia policy, making endless threats to our country and people. Some irresponsible Western politicians are doing more than just speak about their plans to organise the delivery of long-range offensive weapons to Ukraine, which could be used to deliver strikes at Crimea and other Russian regions.

Such terrorist attacks, including with the use of Western weapons, are being delivered at border areas in the Belgorod and Kursk regions. NATO is conducting reconnaissance through Russia’s southern regions in real time and with the use of modern systems, aircraft, vessels, satellites and strategic drones.

Washington, London and Brussels are openly encouraging Kiev to move the hostilities to our territory. They openly say that Russia must be defeated on the battlefield by any means, and subsequently deprived of political, economic, cultural and any other sovereignty and ransacked.

They have even resorted to the nuclear blackmail. I am referring not only to the Western-encouraged shelling of the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, which poses a threat of a nuclear disaster, but also to the statements made by some high-ranking representatives of the leading NATO countries on the possibility and admissibility of using weapons of mass destruction – nuclear weapons – against Russia.

I would like to remind those who make such statements regarding Russia that our country has different types of weapons as well, and some of them are more modern than the weapons NATO countries have. In the event of a threat to the territorial integrity of our country and to defend Russia and our people, we will certainly make use of all weapon systems available to us. This is not a bluff.

The citizens of Russia can rest assured that the territorial integrity of our Motherland, our independence and freedom will be defended – I repeat – by all the systems available to us. Those who are using nuclear blackmail against us should know that the wind rose can turn around."

Bewerten
- +
Ansicht umschalten