"schüttet in seiner Untersuchung nun Wasser in den Wein"

Nun? Das ist doch schon lange klar.

https://www.telepolis.de/forum/p-44103431/

"Die Stunde der Hardliner im Westen"

Im Westen?

"Vladimir Solovyov says Russia should advance to the Atlantic"
"Andrey Gurulyov urges nuclear strikes against Europe"
"Sergey Karaganov says God wants a nuclear escalation"
"Top Russian propagandist threatens the West with nuclear weapons"
"Rallygoers in Moscow demand nuclear strikes against America"
"Vladimir Solovyov wants to nuke Western cities"
"Russian weatherman recommends nuclear strikes against NATO countries"
"Vladimir Solovyov argues not all nuclear wars are dangerous"
"Vladimir Solovyov and Sergei Karaganov discuss nuclear weapons"
"Russian state TV claims America wants a nuclear war"
"Russian propagandist argues that nuclear threats or strikes are the only way to intimidate the West"
"Alexander Sytin says Kharkiv should be destroyed"
"Vladimir Solovyov says Kyiv should be destroyed"
"Vladimir Solovyov wants Kharkiv to be destroyed"
"Andrey Lugovoy wants Kyiv and Kharkiv to be made unlivable"
"Vladimir Solovyov says Russia will take all of Ukraine"
"Margarita Simonyan waits for Russia to take more Ukrainian lands"
"Vladimir Solovyov predicts Russia will imprison European leaders"
...
https://www.youtube.com/@russianmediamonitor/videos

Aber: Im Westen sitzen die Hardliner. Der Westen eskaliert? Russland? Das verteidigt sich nur. Dabei geht es "behutsam" vor, verhält sich "zurückhaltend und moderat".