Campaign 2002: Off to a Rotten Start

Weekly Review: Neither Schröder nor Stoiber set off on the right foot. Also: Fun with genes, particles and temperatures.

Der folgende Beitrag ist vor 2021 erschienen. Unsere Redaktion hat seither ein neues Leitbild und redaktionelle Standards. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier.

With national elections in Germany eight months away, the two main candidates have just about got their campaign teams together. They're settling on themes and slogans, polishing their rhetoric and have agreed in principle to nationally televised debates. Campaign 2002 is underway. This week brought Chancellor Gerhard Schröder a bit of good news and lots and lots of bad news.

First the good news. Edmund Stoiber, the newly anointed candidate for the conservative Christian Democratic Union (see Lederhosen and Laptops), has surprised everyone by bumbling aimlessly through two important television interviews. Getting his names and numbers mixed up along the way, Stoiber has been launching sentences that wander off into nowhereland. On the one hand, unless he gets his act together, this is a serious blow to the CDU, which had been counting on Stoiber's feisty persona to offset Schröder's Clintonian media appeal.

On the other hand -- and here's the first bit of bad news for Schröder -- when voters decide it's time for a right turn, they take it, no matter how ineloquent the candidate. Three words: George Dubya Bush. As for Europe, though, take a quick look at this map which ran in a recent issue of Der Spiegel. You'll see that the social democratic governments that took power throughout the continent in the mid to late 90s, shaded red, are still holding on in the middle; rightish governments, shaded blue, are the upstarts at the edges.

Worse, a short run-down in last week's Observer shows how precarious that social democratic hold is on the center of Europe. For starters, Chirac could easily take France, Portugal's socialists are slipping, and so on.

But the worst news of all for Schröder is the performance of his own government. Particularly in the last week, one screw-up or another has dominated the headlines. In brief:

-- Since late 2000, the government has sought to ban a group of ultranationalist xenophobic right-wing thugs disguising themselves as a political party, the National Democratic Party (NPD). Then came revelations that decisive evidence in the case was provided by at least one German intelligence service informant who'd infiltrated the NPD. A high court in Karlsruhe had little choice but to toss the whole case out. The goof has led to calls for the resignation of Interior Minister Otto Schily.

-- On Friday, a group of government, management and union leaders called the Alliance for Jobs met for a few hours, bickered and then adjourned, having decided on nada. Unemployment was Schröder's number one issue in the 1998 campaign and, with the rate nudging 10 percent, it may be Stoiber's in 2002. When these talks collapsed, Schröder tried to accentuate the positive: In these trying times, what with the German economy floundering and all, it's a wonder you can get the unions and the suits to sit down together in the first place. "No, Mr. Schröder," countered the usually sympathetic Berliner Zeitung, "this meeting was not a success. It was a disaster."

-- In 1999, Schröder and Finance Minister Hans Eichel rammed through the largest cuts in taxes and spending in German postwar history. In part, the gist of this not-so-social democratic reform was to spur growth by granting corporations the chunkiest tax cuts of all. Now it turns out some of Germany's largest companies are figuring out ways to avoid paying any taxes at all. Even Eichel's fellow social democrats are fuming.

-- Defense Minister Rudolf Scharping told European partners Germany would buy 73 of the military transport planes they're building together. The problem is that the total cost would come in at 8.6 billion euros though parliament had only approved 5.1 billion for the purchase. The opposition is kicking up a storm. Scharping had been in political hot water all last year anyway; the last thing he needed was another mudslinging fest in the press.

Not that he's seriously considering it now, but if any of these messes get messier, Schröder can't afford to ditch Schily, Eichel or Scharping months before the election because his cabinet is already perceived as having come equipped with a revolving door. In a pinch, he could counter perceptions of political instability with a strong performance in those television debates, particularly if Stoiber goes on mumbling incoherently. But ultimately, come September, if one out of ten Germans is without a job, with the other nine worrying about theirs, and the Social Democrats, of all parties, can't guarantee a return to economic security, voters will turn elsewhere.

In Telepolis

It's been a strong week for science articles at Telepolis. Editor Florian Rötzer picks up on a Reuters story about pigs being implanted with spinach genes. In part, the goal of the Japanese scientists who pulled off the feat is the production of a leaner, healthier pork, but the significance here is that these genetically engineered pigs are the first mammals to be successfully bred with plant genes.

But Rötzer reminds readers that the head of the team, Akira Iritani, has a habit of directing his research toward stunts that will attract the momentary attention of the media. You might remember the 20,000-year-old mammoth that was supposedly found frozen intact in Siberia in 1999; Iritani predicted that a sort of Jurassic Park-like winter wonderland would feature live prehistoric animals within 20 years. But the mammoth turned out to be not so intact after all, its DNA useless, and in general, the revival of extinct species has proven a lot tougher than mixing and matching what the planet has on offer now.

If funding comes through, work on the TeV-Energy Superconducting Linear Accelerator -- TESLA for short -- could begin next year and be completed by 2012, reports Thorsten Stegemann. Germany would beat the Americans and the Japanese in the great particle accelerator race. Buried beneath Hamburg and the state of Schleswig-Holstein, the thing would stretch 33 kilometers and cost an estimated four billion euros. More info in English.

Cecilia Schreiber casts a skeptical eye on those who cast a skeptical eye on global warming. No fewer than three articles recently appearing in Science undermine the idea that the planet is heating up, with one of them even arguing that it's actually cooling down. "So we see: the deeper scientists probe, the more the warming dissipates," writes Schreiber, "even as the thermometer rises."

In English

EU and US security officials have recently butt heads over how airline passengers are to be checked out on both sides of the Atlantic. Two watchdog organizations requested relevant documents, but the US government vetoed their release. Jelle van Buuren reports.

Elsewhere

A "1999 deal would have combined Enron and Veba, a utility company based in Düsseldorf, Germany, in a so-called merger of equals." The New York Times explains why Veba called the whole thing off.

"There is a long genealogy of fascination with destruction and ruins that transverses German pathos," writes Nicolas Guagnini over at the NY Arts Magazine site. Touchstones in the piece: Karlheinz Stockhausen's now infamous reaction to 9/11, Albert Speer, Casper David Friedrich and Kurt Schwitters. Whew.

"I like the Germans; they're a strange and funny people." Most aren't as funny, though, as Jim Knipfel, who finds himself firing up his "bullshit prolixer" in order to squeak by a series of very odd interviews once his book gets published in Germany. Great stuff from The New York Press.

We've already pointed to the Artforum cover story on Gerhard Richter, essentially an interview with Robert Storr, who's organizing a major retrospective opening at the Museum of Modern Art in New York next month. Michael Kimmelman's lengthy portrait in The New York Times Magazine approaches "Europe's most challenging painter" from another angle altogether.

Another return link: The Neue Galerie. The occasion: John Updike's review in The New York Review of Books.

John O'Mahony profiles Pina Bausch in The Guardian: "One of the seminal performance figures of the 20th century, Bausch is a choreographer who has expanded the possibilities of modern dance, opening up the genre to snatches of dialogue, stage visions and chaotic intrusions from everyday life."